1. DPW Director Flanigan originally presented to the Cecil County Commissioners that the Seneca Point upgrade would be a $60 million project and the Commissioners needed to determine how this project would be funded. Director Flanigan later agreed that the Seneca Point project could be divided into 3 phases and the first phase would cost $40 million.
2. Seneca Point Treatment Plant is required by MDE (Maryland Department of the Environment) to go to ENR (Enhanced Nutrient Removal) by December 31, 2016. *MDE has provided additional time in the past when the County shows it is making a good faith effort in completing a project.
3. The Flush Fund Grant fully covers Seneca Point’s upgrade to ENR but does not cover expansion of capacity. Director Flanigan incorporated into the project the expansion of capacity for the treatment plant and wanted to use the flush fund grant towards the expansion project.
4. MDE tasked Cecil County Government to hire a consultant to determine the least inexpensive system for Seneca Point to achieve ENR.
5. GHD, Cecil County’s consultant, identified Denitrification as the cheapest method at a cost of $9.2 million. *Denitrification could be incorporated by the deadline.
6. MDE approved GHD’s proposal and included additional funding for a total of $10.9 million.
7. The Seneca Point project cost of $40 million minus the flush fund grant ($10.9 million) for expansion would fall on the rate payers, new users and the taxpayers. Because it’s only the first phase, the capacity would remain the same (2 mgd) but would allow for expansion to 4.5 mgd for an additional cost of $18 million.
8. Seneca Point can be expanded using the Denitrification System up to 7.0 mgd on the current footprint. However, when Cecil County does need to expand the treatment plant to that capacity, other factors will be need to be considered such as new environvental regulations and new treatment technologies available.
9. The correspondence between MDE and Cecil County Government relaying this information was never provided to the Cecil County Commissioners. Treasurer, Bill Feehley, confirmed my concern that the Seneca Point project was much larger than required and mentioned the GHD and MDE correspondence. He received a copy of the correspondence because the Treasurer collected the Flush Fund Tax and would be responsible for cutting the check to the County for the funding.
10. Growth in the Seneca Point service area is not anticipated to reach the 2 mgd capacity until 2030 and 2035 so the expansion project could be delayed.
11. Waste water treatment plant (WWTP) technology is fast evolving and new environmental regulations mandated by State and Federal Government would make it wise to wait until we get closer to capacity to decide which treatment system would be the most cost efficient and effective.
12. No pilot test was conducted to compare the efficiency and cost for operations on different filtration systems. No scientific analysis was provided to back up the selection of MBR at Seneca Point.
13. If any investment is made in infrastructure, the priority should be on closing up the water/sewer gap in the growth corridor which would attract growth.
14. The majority of Seneca Point’s WWTP allocations are from 2007 and therefore do not have a significant impact to the capacity available currently at the plant.
15. Director Flanigan has claimed that the real cost for construction to go with the denitrification filter system is $21 million but the consultant and MDE has estimated in the $10 million range.
16. Director Flanigan consistently has not provided information requests in a forthcoming manner. For a Commissioner and now Council Member to make an informed decision, the facts should be provided.
17. There is a claim by DPW Director that we took a vote on August 16, 2011 during the evening Commissioner Meeting :to commit to the MBR technology. However, the audio recording of August 16, 2011 during the work session reveals that we were only committing to a $100,000 engineering cost to GE makers of the specialized ZeeWeed General Electric MBR System. Sole procurement of a system is expensive due to lack of competition
18. The information I gathered regarding the Seneca Point waste water treatment project was provided and or confirmed by “experts”.
9. The correspondence between MDE and Cecil County Government relaying this information was never provided to the Cecil County Commissioners. Treasurer, Bill Feehley, confirmed my concern that the Seneca Point project was much larger than required and mentioned the GHD and MDE correspondence. He received a copy of the correspondence because the Treasurer collected the Flush Fund Tax and would be responsible for cutting the check to the County for the funding.
10. Growth in the Seneca Point service area is not anticipated to reach the 2 mgd capacity until 2030 and 2035 so the expansion project could be delayed.
11. Waste water treatment plant (WWTP) technology is fast evolving and new environmental regulations mandated by State and Federal Government would make it wise to wait until we get closer to capacity to decide which treatment system would be the most cost efficient and effective.
12. No pilot test was conducted to compare the efficiency and cost for operations on different filtration systems. No scientific analysis was provided to back up the selection of MBR at Seneca Point.
13. If any investment is made in infrastructure, the priority should be on closing up the water/sewer gap in the growth corridor which would attract growth.
14. The majority of Seneca Point’s WWTP allocations are from 2007 and therefore do not have a significant impact to the capacity available currently at the plant.
15. Director Flanigan has claimed that the real cost for construction to go with the denitrification filter system is $21 million but the consultant and MDE has estimated in the $10 million range.
16. Director Flanigan consistently has not provided information requests in a forthcoming manner. For a Commissioner and now Council Member to make an informed decision, the facts should be provided.
17. There is a claim by DPW Director that we took a vote on August 16, 2011 during the evening Commissioner Meeting :to commit to the MBR technology. However, the audio recording of August 16, 2011 during the work session reveals that we were only committing to a $100,000 engineering cost to GE makers of the specialized ZeeWeed General Electric MBR System. Sole procurement of a system is expensive due to lack of competition
18. The information I gathered regarding the Seneca Point waste water treatment project was provided and or confirmed by “experts”.
